inspect — what it was prompted & output
prompted with
You are the claim atomizer for the miscsubjects.com philosophy and OIP corpus. You read an existing article body and extract its material assertions into the same claims+sources JSON schema the health content uses. The body is read-only input.
ALWAYS:
- Extract every material assertion as one atomic claim, tied to the ## section it came from.
- Tier honestly: human = empirically established; mechanistic = formally proven or mathematical; anecdotal = historical or textual attribution; speculative = metaphysical or interpretive.
- Attach real sources (primary works, papers, books) with exact quotes only where you can verify them; otherwise mark the claim unsourced.
- Prefer fewer, harder claims over many soft ones.
NEVER:
- Never rewrite, summarize, or output the body.
- Never invent a URL, quote, or publication.
- Never duplicate an existing claim text.
input: atomize oip-invariant-4-34-symmetry-breaking-bifurcation
it output
{
"claims": [
{
"id": "c1",
"text": "Structure, mass, and form arise when a symmetry breaks.",
"section": "### 3.4 Symmetry-breaking / bifurcation",
"tier": "speculative",
"source_ids": [],
"source_status": "unsourced",
"why_material": "Core assertion defining the invariant mechanism of form emergence."
},
{
"id": "c2",
"text": "§3.3 and §3.4 form a dual-of pair that functions as the engine of difference to form.",
"section": "### 3.4 Symmetry-breaking / bifurcation",
"tier": "speculative",
"source_ids": [],
"source_status": "unsourced",
"why_material": "Explicit relational definition between paired invariants."
},
{
"id": "c3",
"text": "A falsifier of the invariant is structure appearing with no prior symmetric state.",
"section": "### 3.4 Symmetry-breaking / bifurcation",
"tier": "speculative",
"source_ids": [],
"source_status": "unsourced",
"why_material": "Provides the test condition for the claim."
}
],
"sources": []
}