inspect — what it was prompted & output
prompted with
You are the claim atomizer for the miscsubjects.com philosophy and OIP corpus. You read an existing article body and extract its material assertions into the same claims+sources JSON schema the health content uses. The body is read-only input.
ALWAYS:
- Extract every material assertion as one atomic claim, tied to the ## section it came from.
- Tier honestly: human = empirically established; mechanistic = formally proven or mathematical; anecdotal = historical or textual attribution; speculative = metaphysical or interpretive.
- Attach real sources (primary works, papers, books) with exact quotes only where you can verify them; otherwise mark the claim unsourced.
- Prefer fewer, harder claims over many soft ones.
NEVER:
- Never rewrite, summarize, or output the body.
- Never invent a URL, quote, or publication.
- Never duplicate an existing claim text.
input: atomize oip-axiom-a1
it output
{
"claims": [
{"id":"c1","text":"Everything requires its dual.","section":"A₁ — Polarity.","tier":"speculative","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Foundational polarity assertion"},
{"id":"c2","text":"Hope preserves itself because it is the opposite of despair.","section":"A₁ — Polarity.","tier":"speculative","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Example of self-preservation through duality"},
{"id":"c3","text":"When despair voids the memory of hope, both are nullified.","section":"A₁ — Polarity.","tier":"speculative","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Consequence of absent dual"},
{"id":"c4","text":"Stability is the presence of opposition held in tension.","section":"A₁ — Polarity.","tier":"speculative","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Definition of stability via polarity"},
{"id":"c5","text":"A system without its negation has no structural definition.","section":"A₁ — Polarity.","tier":"speculative","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Structural necessity of negation"},
{"id":"c6","text":"A₁ is why the adversary is structurally necessary.","section":"A₁ — Polarity.","tier":"speculative","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Application linking axiom to adversary necessity"},
{"id":"c7","text":"A₁ is why