{"_self":{"principle":"Self-explaining payload — no external context required. This _self block describes what you are reading and where to look next.","widget":"article_topology","feature":"topology","name":"Article topology","what":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","contains":"claims, sources, anecdotes, question_graph slice","slug":"protocol-claims","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/topology"},"how_to_use":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","write":null,"imessage":null,"router_tag":null,"proof_chain":[{"step":1,"claim":"Articles are voxel graphs of tiered claims, not prose blobs.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/constitution"},{"step":2,"claim":"Claims link to hash-chained sources via source_ids.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/sources"},{"step":3,"claim":"Ask reads topology; ingest/claim append to ledger.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol"},{"step":4,"claim":"Models queue growth: populate → collaborate → repair → reflex.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/grow"},{"step":5,"claim":"Graph proves its own shape (reflex) and $/claim (yield).","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/graph.html?layer=reflex"},{"step":6,"claim":"Full feature index + _explain on every API response.","verify":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map"}],"related_features":[{"id":"ask","name":"Ask protocol","what":"Answer only from topology; creates question_node with gaps and ingest_hint.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/prompts","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/ask"}},{"id":"graph_topology","name":"Cross-article graph","what":"Merged claims/sources across condition+stack slugs for one question.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/graph-topology?question=..."}},{"id":"question_graph","name":"Question graph","what":"Ask nodes (questions + gaps) and evidence_ingest nodes (pasted model output).","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/question-graph","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/ask"}},{"id":"voxels","name":"Voxel graph","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance.","urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/voxels","write":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/protocol/claim"}}],"system_map":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map","system_map_markdown":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/system-map?format=markdown","not_medical_advice":true},"_explain":{"feature":"topology","name":"Article topology","what":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","why":"Every feature is auditable collective intelligence","how":"Claims, sources, anecdotes, user reports, related embeds, question graph slice — for ask/ROUTER.","model":null,"verifies":null,"urls":{"read":"https://miscsubjects.com/api/articles/protocol-claims/topology"},"imessage":null,"router":null,"related":[{"id":"ask","what":"Answer only from topology; creates question_node with gaps and ingest_hint."},{"id":"graph_topology","what":"Merged claims/sources across condition+stack slugs for one question."},{"id":"question_graph","what":"Ask nodes (questions + gaps) and evidence_ingest nodes (pasted model output)."},{"id":"voxels","what":"Claims as atoms, sources as edges (supported_by, posted_by). Per-claim provenance."}],"not_medical_advice":true},"slug":"protocol-claims","title":"How Claims Work: Voxel Atoms, Tiers, Weights, and Honesty Gates","register":"source_ledger","tags":["system","protocol","claims"],"updated_at":"2026-07-17T02:41:02.013Z","body_excerpt":"## What this article is\n\nThis document explains how the miscsubjects.com claim system works. It defines voxel atoms, tiers, weights, and honesty gates that control what enters published articles.\n\nOne claim equals one falsifiable assertion. Compound claims violate the constitution and fail health audit. System tier is reserved for architecture and protocol axioms, not biological mechanism claims.\n\n## Who claims what\n\nSystem tier claims are authored by the protocol itself. They are not attributed to external studies or anonymous sources.\n\n## What is known\n\n- Posted_by.actor uses canonical format provider/model or system/function for server passes.\n- Source_ids must reference rows in the hash-chained source ledger. Orphan sources can be materialized into claims via repair.\n- Elevation threshold defaults to 0.6. Review contributions scoring below this do not enter the article.\n- Cut_threshold defaults to 0.15. Scored claims below this receive status:cut and drop from reader section order.\n- Adversary challenges append to meta.challenges[] and raise stance_scores.adversary on the target.\n- Retracted claims remain in meta.claims[] with status:retracted. Ask and bundle exclude them unless include_inactive=1.\n- Ingest creates evidence_ingest nodes on the question graph linking pasted text to new sources and claims.\n- Who_claims_what slot must name study authors, platforms, or n= — not anonymous \"studies show\".\n- Ledger_durability.js infers slot from section headers and retiers clinical_trial sources toward human when RCT language present.\n- Weight recomputation is monotonic per score pass. Reviews accumulate. Rest gate discards non-material passes as energy_spent.\n\n## What is unknown\n\nAutomated tier assignment from PubMed titles alone is incomplete. Abstract parsing remains a gap.\n\nCross-model claim deduplication is heuristic. Near-duplicate assertions may coexist until adversary or manual retract.\n\n## Limitations\n\nNo doses, no \"you should take\" — claims violating this fail constitution regardless of weight.\n\n## Disclaimer\n\nThis claim system is for research transparency, not clinical decision support.","ranking":"safety-first (interaction_risk/limitations), then quote-gated effective_weight","claims":[{"id":"c_clm_15","text":"No doses, no 'you should take' — claims violating this fail constitution regardless of weight.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"limitations","slot":"limitations","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_1","text":"One claim equals one falsifiable assertion — compound claims violate the constitution and fail health audit.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what it is","slot":"what_it_is","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_2","text":"system tier is reserved for architecture and protocol axioms, not biological mechanism claims.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what it is","slot":"what_it_is","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_3","text":"posted_by.actor uses canonical format provider/model (e.g. kimi/moonshot-v1-8k) or system/function for server passes.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_4","text":"source_ids must reference rows in the hash-chained source ledger; orphan sources can be materialized into claims via repair.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_5","text":"Elevation threshold default 0.6 — review contributions scoring below this do not enter the article.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_6","text":"cut_threshold default 0.15 — scored claims below this get status:cut and drop from reader section order.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_7","text":"Adversary challenges append to meta.challenges[] and raise stance_scores.adversary on target — symmetric to endorsement.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_8","text":"Retracted claims remain in meta.claims[] with status:retracted — ask and bundle exclude them unless include_inactive=1.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_9","text":"ingest creates evidence_ingest nodes on the question graph linking pasted text to new sources and claims.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is known","slot":"what_is_known","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_10","text":"Who_claims_what slot must name study authors, platforms, or n= — not anonymous 'studies show'.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"who claims what","slot":"who_claims_what","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_11","text":"ledger_durability.js infers slot from section headers and retiers clinical_trial sources toward human when RCT language present.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"who claims what","slot":"who_claims_what","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_12","text":"Automated tier assignment from PubMed titles alone is incomplete — abstract parsing remains a gap.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is unknown","slot":"what_is_unknown","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_13","text":"Cross-model claim deduplication is heuristic — near-duplicate assertions may coexist until adversary or manual retract.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"what is unknown","slot":"what_is_unknown","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_14","text":"Weight recomputation is monotonic per score pass — reviews accumulate; rest gate discards non-material passes as energy_spent.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"mechanism","slot":"mechanism","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false},{"id":"c_clm_16","text":"This claim system is for research transparency, not clinical decision support.","tier":"system","weight":0.35,"section":"disclaimer","slot":"disclaimer","interaction_risk":false,"status":"active","source_ids":[],"source_status":"unsourced","why_material":"Architecture axiom — verifiable via live GET endpoints cited in text.","retracted_at":null,"retraction_reason":null,"challenged_by":[],"effective_weight":0.35,"quote_gated":false}],"sources":[],"anecdotal_sources":[],"scientific_sources":[],"user_reports":[],"related_articles":[{"slug":"protocol","title":"miscsubjects article protocol (constitution)","claims":[{"id":"c1","text":"Articles are voxel graphs of tiered claims with hash-chained sources.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c2","text":"Every new claim must include posted_by provenance.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c3","text":"Not medical advice — tier-honest evidence only.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c4","text":"Problem 1 (hallucination): solved by tier weights + mandatory source_ids + hash-chained ledger — no source = unsourced + why_material; models cannot invent citations.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c5","text":"Problem 2 (evidence inflation): solved by hardcoded tier weights — human 0.8, preclinical 0.5, anecdotal 0.3 — weight is declared in schema, not inferred by prose.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c6","text":"Problem 3 (knowledge rot): solved by append-only ledger — retractions stay visible as status:retracted + retraction events; corrections link to false claims permanently.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c7","text":"Problem 4 (model monoculture): solved by mandatory posted_by provenance — each model contribution tagged and visible; cross-model challenge is a trust dimension.","tier":"speculative"},{"id":"c8","text":"Problem 5 (knowledge sprawl): solved by ontology tree + misstep detection — peptide roots, condition branches, stack compositions; duplicate scope flagged for merge/reparent.","tier":"speculative"}]},{"slug":"protocol-api-structure","title":"Protocol API Structure: REST Surface, Objects, and Phase Machine","claims":[{"id":"c_api_1","text":"GET /api/protocol returns the live machine contract — endpoint list, body schemas, and phase definitions; it is the authoritative API map.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_2","text":"The protocol splits into two planes: /api/articles for CRUD and sub-resources, and /api/protocol for phase operations (populate, review, score, grow).","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_3","text":"Claims live in article.meta.claims[]; sources in meta.sources[] with prev/hash chain; provenance in meta.provenance[] — all append-only.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_4","text":"POST /api/protocol/draft validates tiers, optionally verifies source URLs, hash-chains sources, and publishes or updates the article head.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_5","text":"POST /api/protocol/populate ingests science + social sources into an article without rewriting body — forest-first growth.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_6","text":"POST /api/protocol/collaborate lets Kimi or Gemini read topology and append 1–3 claims with posted_by; optional require_challenge for adversary pass.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_7","text":"POST /api/protocol/score recomputes claim.weight from base(tier) + endorsement_sum − adversary_sum; claims below cut_threshold get status:cut.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_api_8","text":"GET /api/protocol/next?role=writer atomically claims one open task; POST /api/protocol/run executes one scheduler tick inside the 100s request cap.","tier":"system"}]},{"slug":"protocol-widgets","title":"Protocol Widgets: Self-Explanation, Vault Cards, and Native Embeds","claims":[{"id":"c_wid_1","text":"Every attachSelf() response includes _self.what, _self.how_to_use, and _self.related URLs — widgets are self-explaining payloads, not static HTML.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_2","text":"FEATURES in self_explain.js is the canonical feature index; system-map article exposes it for humans and LLMs.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_3","text":"sourceToWidget() maps hash-chained ledger sources to native platform cards (reddit, x, pubmed, youtube, imessage) on the reader page.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_4","text":"buildInlineEmbedMap() resolves [[embed:slug]] markers in article body to horizontal native cards without external iframes.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_5","text":"normalizeWidget() in vault_widgets.js unifies directory rows, tasks, events, and claims into vault-card rails with shortHash ids.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_6","text":"meta.widgets[] supports imessage|quote|stat|note|gallery types as JSON series independent of the source ledger.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_7","text":"Graph canvas widgets come from GET /api/graph — nodes are claims/sources, edges are supported_by, posted_by, challenges, embeds.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_wid_8","text":"explainGrowStep() returns human-readable why/how for each grow-queue step — operational widget for cron operators.","tier":"system"}]},{"slug":"protocol-logic","title":"The Logic of the Logic: Recursive Ledger, Entropy, and Combinatorial Control","claims":[{"id":"c_log_1","text":"The combinatorial matrix treats degenerative conditions and degenerative pharma as entropy targets on the same ledger plane.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_2","text":"delta = regen_score − degen_score is the elevation signal for queueing cross articles — disclosed methodology, not a black-box rank.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_3","text":"planNextTick() merges gap audit and entropy audit into a single prioritized slug list for grow and matrix/tick.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_4","text":"graph_grow_queue prepends matrix-planned slugs before legacy PRIORITY_SLUGS — canonical gaps override editorial hooks.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_5","text":"entropy_score rises with orphan count, missing roots, and low-delta written crosses; negentropy_score tracks coverage convergence.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_6","text":"parseCrossSlug() resolves article slugs to peptide×target cells for mapping backfill on existing corpus.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_7","text":"Pipeline table holds 1254 combo rows after full sync — deterministic seed replaces LLM-only pipelineSeed for inventory.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_log_8","text":"Reflex pass posts system-tier claims that cite live endpoint probes — the graph validates its own API surface.","tier":"system"}]},{"slug":"protocol-framework-utility","title":"What This Framework Enables: Use Cases Beyond Peptide Catalogues","claims":[{"id":"c_use_1","text":"The framework separates transport (REST protocol), evidence atoms (claims), and presentation (widgets) — each layer inspectable independently.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_2","text":"POST /api/protocol/ask returns gaps[] and ingest_hint — the ledger tells the user what evidence would materially improve the answer.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_3","text":"Combinatorial matrix generalizes to any inventory × target grid where regen/degen scores can be defined transparently.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_4","text":"Multi-model collaborate preserves each model's original contribution — useful for audit, dispute resolution, and bias detection.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_5","text":"Graph canvas GET /api/graph enables cross-article reasoning without copying full bodies into prompt context.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_6","text":"iMessage/WhatsApp ingest paths let lay users add anecdotal tier evidence that enters the same hash-chained ledger.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_7","text":"Obsidian vault export supports offline research workflows while keeping slug parity with the live corpus.","tier":"system"},{"id":"c_use_8","text":"Tasks REST + dispatch directory let cron and human operators invoke protocol steps as named functions.","tier":"system"}]}],"question_graph":{"slug":"protocol-claims","questions":[],"evidence":[],"edges":[],"counts":{"questions":0,"evidence":0,"edges":0}},"honesty":{"active_claims":16,"retracted_claims":0,"cut_claims":0,"challenges":0,"scrub_events":0,"note":"Retracted/cut claims stay on ledger but are excluded from ask unless ?include_inactive=1"},"counts":{"claims":16,"claims_total":16,"sources":0,"anecdotal":0,"scientific":0,"user_reports":0,"questions":0,"evidence_ingests":0}}