{"slug":"oip-disconfirming-edge-3","verification":{"valid":true,"entries":6,"head":"136ef4919095e88541829853a54c55511e57443dbbd07edeeb84ccdf6f1eb2d7"},"energy":{"passes":6,"tokens_in":3115,"tokens_out":1854,"tokens_total":4969,"cost_usd":0,"models":{"claude-fable-5":3,"grok/grok-4.3":1,"scorer":1,"owner":1},"head":"136ef4919095e88541829853a54c55511e57443dbbd07edeeb84ccdf6f1eb2d7"},"provenance":[{"ts":"2026-07-04T03:33:08.948Z","model":"claude-fable-5","action":"restore","prompt":"","input":"","response":"","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"genesis","hash":"151abfa907d866a9e774b257fa3e55f8a184be5c7caddbfa06d40e6d2f351074"},{"ts":"2026-07-04T04:33:43.011Z","model":"claude-fable-5","action":"edit","prompt":"","input":"","response":"","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"151abfa907d866a9e774b257fa3e55f8a184be5c7caddbfa06d40e6d2f351074","hash":"224ac5a71e28259f0b2b521bc442481e7315502f09b1d0582c85dc5416104847"},{"ts":"2026-07-04T05:01:41.237Z","model":"claude-fable-5","action":"edit","prompt":"","input":"","response":"","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"224ac5a71e28259f0b2b521bc442481e7315502f09b1d0582c85dc5416104847","hash":"589ac92670da6e24e0f90f97e18ad32f5711c33999b9d42de6fec3b13a789c7a"},{"ts":"2026-07-07T08:19:49.303Z","model":"grok/grok-4.3","action":"atomize","prompt":"You are the claim atomizer for the miscsubjects.com philosophy and OIP corpus. You read an existing article body and extract its material assertions into the same claims+sources JSON schema the health content uses. The body is read-only input.\n\nALWAYS:\n- Extract every material assertion as one atomic claim, tied to the ## section it came from.\n- Tier honestly: human = empirically established; mechanistic = formally proven or mathematical; anecdotal = historical or textual attribution; speculative = metaphysical or interpretive.\n- Attach real sources (primary works, papers, books) with exact quotes only where you can verify them; otherwise mark the claim unsourced.\n- Prefer fewer, harder claims over many soft ones.\n\nNEVER:\n- Never rewrite, summarize, or output the body.\n- Never invent a URL, quote, or publication.\n- Never duplicate an existing claim text.","input":"atomize oip-disconfirming-edge-3","response":"{\n  \"claims\": [\n    {\n      \"id\": \"c1\",\n      \"text\": \"C21 (Emergence) contradicts C02 (Least Action).\",\n      \"section\": \"## Disconfirming Edge 3\",\n      \"tier\": \"speculative\",\n      \"source_ids\": [],\n      \"source_status\": \"unsourced\",\n      \"why_material\": \"Core tension stated as the starting assertion of the article.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"c2\",\n      \"text\": \"Under the least action principle, emergence consists only in the appearance of new minima at larger scales rather than genuinely new laws.\",\n      \"section\": \"## Disconfirming Edge 3\",\n      \"tier\": \"speculative\",\n      \"source_ids\": [],\n      \"source_status\": \"unsourced\",\n      \"why_material\": \"Direct implication drawn from the stated contradiction.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"c3\",\n      \"text\": \"Emergence claims that new principles at each scale are irreducible.\",\n      \"section\": \"## Disconfirming Edge 3\",\n      \"tier\": \"speculative\",\n      \"source_ids\": [],\n      \"source_status\": \"unsourced\",\n      \"why_material\": \"Contrasting claim required for the tension.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"c4\",\n      \"text\": \"The resolution status of the C21–C02 tension is OPEN.\",\n      \"section\": \"## Disconfirming Edge 3\",\n      \"tier\": \"speculative\",\n      \"source_ids\": [],\n      \"source_status\": \"unsourced\",\n      \"why_material\": \"Explicit status label attached to the debate.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"c5\",\n      \"text\": \"Effective field theory shows higher-level Lagrangians are derivable from lower-level ones with renormalized parameters that are computationally irreducible.\",\n      \"section\": \"## Disconfirming Edge 3\",\n      \"tier\": \"mechanistic\",\n      \"source_ids\": [],\n      \"source_status\": \"unsourced\",\n      \"why_material\": \"Current-state factual assertion about physics.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"id\": \"c6\",\n      \"text\": \"The ontological status of computational irreducibility in effective field theory is disputed.\",\n      \"section\": \"## Disconfirming Edge 3\",\n      \"tier\": \"speculative\",\n      \"source_ids\": [],\n      ","tokens_in":3115,"tokens_out":1854,"cost":0,"prev":"589ac92670da6e24e0f90f97e18ad32f5711c33999b9d42de6fec3b13a789c7a","hash":"2d94bbdddf168042c937e30968e875f9c876e0d575cadfb65206133305bb3785"},{"ts":"2026-07-07T08:19:49.629Z","model":"scorer","action":"score","prompt":"","input":"oip-disconfirming-edge-3","response":"[{\"claim_id\":\"c1\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c2\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c3\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c4\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c6\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c7\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"},{\"claim_id\":\"c8\",\"old_weight\":0.1,\"new_weight\":0.1,\"status\":\"cut\"}]","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"2d94bbdddf168042c937e30968e875f9c876e0d575cadfb65206133305bb3785","hash":"d3c5d457f05d77aa3667f9ad255358cc5a44ee1e3fc0bb4647aae7ff4317a8b9"},{"ts":"2026-07-17T02:36:10.820Z","model":"owner","action":"voxel_divide","prompt":"","input":"oip-disconfirming-edge-3","response":"9 DIVs from body (verbatim, roundtrip-checked)","tokens_in":0,"tokens_out":0,"cost":0,"prev":"d3c5d457f05d77aa3667f9ad255358cc5a44ee1e3fc0bb4647aae7ff4317a8b9","hash":"136ef4919095e88541829853a54c55511e57443dbbd07edeeb84ccdf6f1eb2d7"}]}