{"slug":"notified-body-ai-act-conformity","verification":{"valid":true,"entries":7,"head":"4882da4b885e4d54fffdffe238eb5f56b2ce73ffa2f1b1cac7fc904722363838"},"count":7,"sources":[{"id":"s1","type":"live_surface","title":"Article 12, adjudicated verbatim by five models","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/adjudication-ai-act-article-12-logging","summary":"The actual text of AI Act Article 12 put through the governed panel: five models, unanimous refusal to certify compliance from the evidence offered, and the complete event log of the adjudication itself — the log that Article 12 asks for, produced while assessing Article 12.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c4","c5"],"prev":"genesis","hash":"5b9172700473a92f5c7cf4ad24718869697ae69b4d3d49b64d38a138c3049470"},{"id":"s2","type":"live_surface","title":"The attested conformance map — what is and is not satisfied, clause by clause","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/attested-finding-conformance-map","summary":"AI Act Articles 12 and 14, FRE 902, ISA 705, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 and IEC 61508, mapped row by row to the build's artifacts, with every row stating explicitly what is NOT satisfied.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c7","c9"],"prev":"5b9172700473a92f5c7cf4ad24718869697ae69b4d3d49b64d38a138c3049470","hash":"7313f95c1a8d058122fb5a7dce87ddae7c8c5a02d4c2d73e2fbedb26363eda45"},{"id":"s3","type":"live_surface","title":"The derivation-agreement gate and the escalate-to-a-named-human default","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/auditable-reasoning-hardened","summary":"Independent models under a pinned rule set; the gate refuses to authorise when clause-by-clause derivations diverge, even on a unanimous verdict; the default outcome is escalation to a named human. Includes the false-convergence defect the gate itself exhibited, and its fix.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c6","c8"],"prev":"7313f95c1a8d058122fb5a7dce87ddae7c8c5a02d4c2d73e2fbedb26363eda45","hash":"8b31ac4e652ee5af08352c360c38922b05d96e18761c9f3c5cc257df8ff19588"},{"id":"s4","type":"live_surface","title":"Measured per-model error rates under a fixed rule set","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/a/adjudication-probe-report-eu-ai-act","summary":"Per-model error rates, Krippendorff alpha, Fleiss kappa, and the prevalence paradox, measured on an EU AI Act task class — the quantitative annex a technical-documentation review needs.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c10"],"prev":"8b31ac4e652ee5af08352c360c38922b05d96e18761c9f3c5cc257df8ff19588","hash":"6eee1a02f647cbbec223745e0fb07c53c7c0bcaf25ba913092050d4a886f20a8"},{"id":"s5","type":"live_surface","title":"A unanimous verdict, refused","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_o6s0exhodd","summary":"Three models returned the same verdict citing the same clauses; two derived it through different trigger states, so the gate refused to conclude and escalated. Agreement that hides disagreement cannot authorise.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c6"],"prev":"6eee1a02f647cbbec223745e0fb07c53c7c0bcaf25ba913092050d4a886f20a8","hash":"9e23991fe95c95d35f92e8c7438d03d03125d07c9f5db58c16c8537955275beb"},{"id":"s6","type":"live_surface","title":"The genuine APPROVE — unanimous verdict, identical derivation","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_wl0rnh136b","summary":"The one clean authorisation on record: every seat fired the same clauses in the same trigger states on the same evidence, and the complete exchange is preserved verbatim.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c5"],"prev":"9e23991fe95c95d35f92e8c7438d03d03125d07c9f5db58c16c8537955275beb","hash":"706006188677bd0023e5e6c204c0915ae066c2371fc5c695f410f84a2fd557ba"},{"id":"s7","type":"live_surface","title":"A malformed finding, voided","publisher":"miscsubjects.com","url":"https://miscsubjects.com/receipt/inv_2dsklah529","summary":"A seat cited clauses that do not exist in the rule set. The deterministic parser voided the finding; structurally invalid output can never authorise. Fail-closed, on the record.","accessed_at":"2026-07-30T00:00","claim_ids":["c8"],"prev":"706006188677bd0023e5e6c204c0915ae066c2371fc5c695f410f84a2fd557ba","hash":"4882da4b885e4d54fffdffe238eb5f56b2ce73ffa2f1b1cac7fc904722363838"}]}